Know about Gawaahi.com? Want to help us give voice to the voiceless, speak out against injustice? Or just celebrate our voices? Join us!

First appeared on Dawn Blog

Background:

On April 21, 2011 the Supreme Court of Pakistan announced the verdict on Mukhtar Mai’s case. According to the verdict, the initial judgment of the Lahore High Court was upheld and five out of six accused in Mai’s gang rape were acquitted. Various news channels covered the acquittal including several talkshows, which invited Mukhtar Mai for her reaction on the verdict. One of them was Mubashir Lucman, host of a popular talk show on an Urdu news channel.

Please watch the video here and read the details of theMukhtar Mai case history here.

Dear Mr. Mubashir Lucman,

This is in reference to your talkshow covering the Supreme Court’s verdict of Mukhtar Mai’s case. I must begin with confessing that I have never been an avid viewer of your show. In fact, I usually avoid it owing to your unnecessarily harsh tone, which often tends to cross over basic journalism ethics. Despite that, I was not expecting the kind of tone, body language and overall journalistic misconduct demonstrated by you on the show.

You began the show by introducing Mai in the most insulting and derogatory way possible. Allow me to quote you: “Unhon nay poori dunya ka daura bhi karliya, poori dunya main chakar bhi laga liyay, or koi rafai kaam karnay ki bhi koshish ki”

“She has travelled extensively and has also ‘tried’ to do some welfare work.”

As evident by your baseless statement made on the show, you have little or no background information on Mai’s case. Mukhtar Mai Women’s Welfare Organisation have been working since 2003. The organisation has set up schools, one of which currently provides education to over 500 girls from nursery to Matric. Apart from, that the organisation also has built a shelter home and operates an ambulance service. If these records are anything to go by, Mukhtar Mai has done far more than just ‘trying’ to do welfare.

Even if we ignore the initial question asking Mukhtar Mai why she feels that the court decided against her appeal, your questions to Mukhtara Mai were not only harsh but illogical, poorly-framed and reflected the lack of insight from your end. Instead of letting Mai complete her answers, you cross-questioned her on her brother’s case. The cross-questioning was futile owing to the fact that it showed you had no knowledge of the brother’s case. Allow me to enlighten you: Mai’s brother Shakoor was sodomised by three men of the Mastoi clan. This was proved in court; the court sentenced those three men.

Moreover, when Mukhtar Mai asked why the court dragged her case if they had to uphold the same decision, you replied with ‘Writ to apnay ki thi’.’ (You are the one that registered an appeal).

Mai dared to stand up for herself and her family despite hailing from a rural background where influential tribesmen literally own the life and wealth of those they consider inferior to them. She spoke up in a society where reporting a rape case is an ordeal in itself and blaming the victim reinforces the culture of silence and shame.

By this time Mai, who had earlier stated her disappointment and hopelessness in the judicial system, had left the room. This is no ordinary woman, Mr. Lucman. She was gang raped on the orders of a jirga (illegal and banned), paraded naked around the entire village and then made to wait for nine long years – only to be turned down. From battling with influential tribesmen, rowdy politicians and jurisdiction dilemmas to constant death threats, this woman has suffered a lot, to say the least. Ignoring the entire ordeal, you not only chose to make ill-informed remarks but also did nothing to cross-question your guests, namely Hafeezullah Niazi and Mian Ghaffar. Your guest on the show accused the courts of being biased, taking dictations from unknown sources and also declared the case fictitious.  If you have forgotten, let me remind you that the Supreme Court of Pakistan has declared one of the six men guilty of raping Mai. For someone to declare the rape fictitious, it falls under contempt of court. Instead of cross-questioning the guest in question, you concluded with remarks such as ‘tou Musharraf theek kehta tha” “so was Musharraf right?”  Were you actually referring to General Musharraf’s obnoxious remark which was something to the effect of: women should not wash their dirty linen in public and that country’s image should not be tarnished by giving a gang rape victim too much attention?

Moreover you had the audacity to ask Mai if she felt any compassion for the men who were charged with rape? I find that deplorable and shoddy journalism. Do you expect her to sympathise with the men she accused of raping her?

The entire discussion on the show was a vicious attack not only at Mai, a rape survivor, but women’s rights activists as well.  Accusing activists of pocketing money (without substantial evidence, might I add) and cashing in on rape, reflects your views on rape victims.

It is people like you and attitudes such as yours that feed the vicious cycle of prejudice against rape victims, making the fight for justice harder. It is appalling that you would allow your guests to hurl allegations on Mai, call her rape fictitious without any substantial evidence and in the presence of a Supreme Court judgment.

It was appalling to witness you cross-question Mai, while ignoring the plight of hundreds of women who have suffered at the hands of these illegal jirgas. Not once in your programme did you mention the innumerous decisions made by these notorious jirgas, from burying women alive to feeding them to the dogs.  Your attitude in the program and your approach to the case is an insult to the plight of the 2,903 women who were raped in 2010 alone and may never get justice.

For all of this you must apologise. I demand you read up on Mai’s case and issue a public apology not only to Mai but to the Pakistani men and women who have been left dejected but will continue the fight against rape and abuse.

Signed,

Sana Saleem

If you’re new here, you may want to subscribe to my RSS feed. Thanks for visiting!

Enhanced by Zemanta
Advertisements

14 thoughts on “An open letter to Mubashir Lucman

  1. Mubashir Lucman is rude, ignorant, blackmailer and crazy person. He is a shame for all Pakistan. He has no personal dignity and moral value and I don’t agree that he is a journalist.

  2. What else can you expect from a man like Mr Mubashir Lucman. You maybe surprised by his behaviour but his behaviour is exactly what one who knows him could expect of him.

  3. Well, i am confused.
    Are you smarter than our supreme court, high court and our judicial system.
    You think the fact is what you know….and you write.
    Anything else is just a misjudgment.

    All i know is……if a decision is made by the high court and was maintained by supreme court. They must be having some grounds and basis for that.

    You must be acknowledged of the reasons for the decision, if not, you can get it from supreme court website…..share it as well……..

    just stop blaming everything in your country……..

  4. Hi,
    Such a shamefull nation we are? Have you been there (in Mukhtara mai village) and ask the people what happened exactly. If you know then you will never write such baseless things. Jirga or Punchait never held in the presence of only 5 or 10 people most respectable people take part in it and it is a type of court which decide the matters of their own people. I think many times why the decisions of Supereme court are not honoured becuse the people like you always there.

    Think about the nation not only for women!!!! We all are equal and have same rights. Nobody come straight from the sky.
    Hope you will not delete my comments?????

  5. Open letter? What exactly have these open letter type activists achieved so far???
    They are only spreading negativity to the society.

    Nothing against you but try to brng a positive approach and help build a better society. Leaving a once in while we know country will get better remark on twitter will do no good. Twitter and Dawn are not the mediums heard country wide esp in English.

  6. Its a big shame that if somebody leaves comments which are disagreeing with the Author are not published. You should learn to read comments from a wider range of the society. please try to leave out of the bubble.

    I am not defending Mubashir Lucman but you should have raised voice before about his indecent behaviour and rather than asking fro apology from him you should ask the investigation team to apologize for not conducting their duties properly. A voice against rape should be raised which is eating a rural society.
    10 like minded people with get together and say Oh Sana ! well done !

    I am sorry but you are no better than the shameless people who are not carrying out their duties properly. Try having some courage and read all the comments.
    Many Thanks !

  7. Do you honestly feel that Lucman is just misunderstood? That he just needs to be corrected? That he is not aware of what he is doing? I doubt it, and because of that I also doubt if an open letter will do much.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s